Does the forward premium anomaly depend on the sample period used or on the sign of the premium?

Su Zhou and Ali M. Kutan

Received 25 February 2003;  Revised 27 May 2003;  accepted 30 June 2003.  Available online 23 October 2003.

Abstract

Some recent studies claim that forward exchange rate bias is asymmetrical in that the empirical rejection of the unbiasedness hypothesis, especially the forward premium anomaly (i.e., the finding of a significantly negative relation between the forward premium and the future change in the spot rate), is for the situation when the forward U.S. dollar is quoted at a discount but not for the cases when it is quoted at a premium. At the same time, some other studies show that the forward premium anomaly is mainly associated with the data of the early and mid-1980s. This study demonstrates that the forward premium anomaly mainly depends on the sample period used, rather than on the sign of the forward premium. Evidence provided in this paper suggests either a significantly negative relation between the forward premium and the future change in the spot rate in the 1980s, or simply no significant relation between the two during other periods regardless of whether the forward dollar is quoted at a premium or a discount.

Author Keywords: Forward rate unbiasedness hypothesis; Asymmetry in forward exchange rate bias; Peso problem

F31; G15