eferee Reports
This page explains the structure of the reports and three ways of transmitting them to the
editorial office.
A referee report consists of two parts: (i) a cover letter with the manuscript number/title and
your opinion, and
(ii) the report itself intended to be transmitted to the author(s).
The editorial address is:
Hamid Beladi (economics) or Carl R. Chen (finance)
International Review of Economics & Finance
School of Business
University of Dayton
300 College Park
Dayton, OH 45469-2237
USA
Email: IREF@udayton.edu
E-mail Reports
E-mail reports are acceptable. Actually, they are preferred to reports by fax or
mail, because snail mail slows the editorial process and fax reports are often
difficult to read because of low resolution and small letters. If it is
successfully transmitted, you will get a confirmation from the editorial office.
Do not use MIME.
Fax Reports
Fax 1 copy each of your cover letter and comments. If it is not too much trouble, also mail
them.
Reports by Snail Mail ONLY
Please mail 1 cover letter plus 2 copies of your comments.
Cover Letter
As we enter the new century, the editorial process should be improved.
You can reduce the frustration of authors and help the profession immensely
if your cover letter includes:
- manuscript number (it takes time to locate the manuscript without it).
- the title (in case there is an error in the manuscript number, this insures that the
editorial office locates the manuscript).
- your postal address
- your email address (please include it in the text). In case the authors
have brief questions by email concerning how to revise the manuscript, the
office will try to convey the message to the referees.
- your summary opinion
- A. Accept in present form or with slight changes.
- B. Accept for publication after minor revision, with a suggestion about the length.
- C. Reconsider for publication after extensive revision.
- D. Reject, with suggestions for possible submission elsewhere.
- E. Shrink to a note (of no more than 10 pages) with suggestions
Report
Prepare your comments that include your reasons, suggestions, and concerns. Comment on
the
manuscript's originality, clarity, contribution to literature, and relevance to real world
problems. Make
suggestions about its length, organization, tables, and figures.
The bottom line is this: if there is an important idea in the paper,
make constructive comments (e.g., how to streamline the arguments, what parts
should be cut) and help authors publish the paper. If not, say so frankly.
There is no point in beating about the bush. If the paper is clearly below IREF standards, detailed comments are unnecessary.
If you lose the manuscript
Referees who travel frequently occasionally lose manuscripts. If this happens, just contact
the editorial office,
and you will get another copy.
Nothing is more appreciated by authors than a prompt referee report.
Submission |
Before submission |
Subscription |
Referee report |
Revising your paper |
Rejected?|
IREF Style |
Editorial Board |
Announcement |
Principles |
Who subscribes to IREF? |
Volume 1 |
Volume 2 |
Volume 3 |
Volume 4 |
Volume 5 |
RIE |
IEFS |
RDE |
EDA |
PER |
HKEA
"Writing a referee report in the old days."
With apologies to "Monet painting in his floating studio" by Manet WebMuseum, Paris